Book Review: Juliet – Anne Fortier

Title: Juliet
Author: Anne Fortier
ISBN: 9780345516107
Pages: 464
Release Date: August 24, 2010
Publisher: Ballantine Books
Genre: Historical Fiction, Contemporary Fiction
Source: Publisher
Rating: 3 out of 5

Summary:

When her Aunt Rose dies, Julie Jacobs is bereft.  After all, Aunt Rose is really all she has left in the world since her parents are dead.  Julie does have a twin sister, Janice, but she’s so flighty and self-involved, Julie might as well be alone.  It comes as a shock, then, when Janice is left Rose’s entire estate, while Julie gets one measly key, a passport with the name Giulietta Tolomei, and instructions to go to Siena, Italy.  Once there, Julie (or is it Giulietta?) begins to delve into the past and understand her connection to the original story of Romeo and Juliet.

Review:

I had mixed feelings regarding Juliet before I even started the book.  I’ve never really been captured by the story of Romeo and Juliet, so I wasn’t that interested in it when I first heard about the novel.  But then it was prominently featured at a panel at Book Expo America and it did sound interesting, so I changed my mind.  By the time I got around to Juliet, I was really excited to read it.

Unfortunately, Juliet didn’t work for me as well as I’d hoped.  Part of the reason was my original hesitation – I’m just not that interested in the “romantic” story of Romeo and Juliet.  After all, they were just a couple of teenagers that decided suddenly that they were in love and got caught up in the feud between their families, and then (in my opinion) drastically overreacted to their circumstances.  Therefore, when Julie became convinced there was a curse upon her house and her story began to mirror that of Juliet’s, I couldn’t help but roll my eyes.

The novel also has a thriller feel, which surprised me.  From the subject matter and the way it was described, I expected a very literary suspense story, in the vein of The Historian.  Therefore, the pace of the book didn’t really sit well with me.  Additionally, I just found the entire thing difficult to believe.  The novel gets stranger and stranger as the novel progresses, to the point where I just couldn’t go along with it anymore.  The coincidences, the setups, the discoveries – it just became too much for me.

Juliet does show promise, and I think if Anne Fortier tried her hand at a more literary, less Da Vinci Code-esque (Publisher’s Weekly’s comparison, not mine) novel, it would have worked much better for me.  I did appreciate Fortier’s historical take on the legend.  She did a wonderful job bringing medieval Siena to life and I thought her interpretation of the story was fascinating.  It was the modern day part that I had trouble with, and that is the majority of the book.

In the end, I was very disappointed in Juliet, especially after all the great reviews I’d read.  There was a lot going on, and I’m not sure it all tied together well.  However, the novel showed enough promise to where I’ll keep a look out for anything else Anne Fortier writes, and would be willing to pick it up.  If you’re a huge fan of the Romeo and Juliet story, I wouldn’t hesitate to read this book.  If you’re ambivalent, though, I’m not sure I can recommend it, but most others probably will!

Affiliate Links:

Buy this book from Powell’s Books
Buy this book from Amazon.com

Comments

  1. I’m sorry to hear this book was a letdown. I borrowed the book from the library awhile back but just didn’t get around to it since the date was due and I’ve to return it. I’m hoping to get to it, soon.

  2. I’m sorry to hear this book was a letdown. I borrowed the book from the library awhile back but just didn’t get around to it since the date was due and I’ve to return it. I’m hoping to get to it, soon.

  3. That’s not just your opinion–Romeo and Juliet is an intentional cautionary tale, so I have a huge problem trying to read it as ‘romantic’.

  4. That’s not just your opinion–Romeo and Juliet is an intentional cautionary tale, so I have a huge problem trying to read it as ‘romantic’.

  5. No I tend to be more of a realist so that whole romantic drama makes me roll my eyes too. And when you said DaVinci Code-ish, that sealed the deal for me. I will pass!

  6. No I tend to be more of a realist so that whole romantic drama makes me roll my eyes too. And when you said DaVinci Code-ish, that sealed the deal for me. I will pass!

  7. I’m glad to hear clarification about why you didn’t like it, knowing that you didn’t love it has made me really hesitant about reading it, but now I think that it might work for me if I go into it aware of some of the limitations.

  8. I’m glad to hear clarification about why you didn’t like it, knowing that you didn’t love it has made me really hesitant about reading it, but now I think that it might work for me if I go into it aware of some of the limitations.

  9. Yours isn’t the first mixed review I’ve read, so I’m thinking this isn’t one for me! I have always enjoyed Romeo & Juliet — despite having to read it three or four times in school! — but think I’d have a hard time with this Juliet.

  10. Yours isn’t the first mixed review I’ve read, so I’m thinking this isn’t one for me! I have always enjoyed Romeo & Juliet — despite having to read it three or four times in school! — but think I’d have a hard time with this Juliet.

  11. I would have to say that I fall in the “ambivalent” category when it comes to Romeo and Juliet, so I don’t think this book would really work for me. I have been seeing it all over the place though, so I was glad to read your very thoughtful and honest review. I am sure there are tons out there who would love this book, but your review really helped me to see that I am not one of them.

  12. I would have to say that I fall in the “ambivalent” category when it comes to Romeo and Juliet, so I don’t think this book would really work for me. I have been seeing it all over the place though, so I was glad to read your very thoughtful and honest review. I am sure there are tons out there who would love this book, but your review really helped me to see that I am not one of them.

  13. I’ve read some mixed reviews as well. I think this book would be one that I would enjoy. I have it sitting on my shelf, patiently waiting to be read. I’m not sure when i’ll get the chance to read it, but I hope it will be soon.

  14. I’ve read some mixed reviews as well. I think this book would be one that I would enjoy. I have it sitting on my shelf, patiently waiting to be read. I’m not sure when i’ll get the chance to read it, but I hope it will be soon.

  15. Thanks for the honest review. I, too, don’t find Romeo & Juliet to be all that romantic or interesting, so I had been a bit cool on this. Will likely pass.

  16. Thanks for the honest review. I, too, don’t find Romeo & Juliet to be all that romantic or interesting, so I had been a bit cool on this. Will likely pass.

  17. This book does have an interesting premise though, doesn’t it? I liked ‘Romeo and Juliet’ when I studied it at school so may give this a try. Although often with these kinds of layered historical thrillers it’s usually the modern day bits that don’t come off worse.

  18. This book does have an interesting premise though, doesn’t it? I liked ‘Romeo and Juliet’ when I studied it at school so may give this a try. Although often with these kinds of layered historical thrillers it’s usually the modern day bits that don’t come off worse.

  19. I feel the same way about Romeo and Juliet, but I have a copy of this book and am looking forward to giving it a try.

  20. I feel the same way about Romeo and Juliet, but I have a copy of this book and am looking forward to giving it a try.

Leave a Reply

Comment Policy:  I welcome comments and read each one I receive. If your comment needs a response, I will provide it in a timely manner, as I read every comment I receive. Please keep your comments civil and polite! I reserve the right to delete any comments that are rude or inappropriate. Because of spam, I have to moderate comments on old posts. Please be patient - I will approve your comment quickly.

Before the tag in the Genesis footer: !-- Quantcast Tag -->